Consistency in emerging-market debt may be elusive for many managers, but it doesn’t have to be that way, as Barney Goodchild and Aaron Grehan explain.
Emerging market debt (EMD) can offer significant returns but has historically been susceptible to periods of increased volatility and rapid spread widening, as recently witnessed in 2021 and 2022 when global inflation concerns and the Russian invasion of Ukraine saw negative returns across EMD.
We believe there are three main reasons many managers fail to outperform during periods of market weakness:
- A structural bias towards the higher-yielding parts of the EMD market
- A poor understanding of EM-specific risk factors and overreliance on traditional risk metrics
- Deficiencies in portfolio construction that lead to concentrated portfolios and overreliance on credit spread compression
A failure to fully consider these factors is likely to lead to higher drawdowns and increased volatility of excess returns over the long run.
Download “An unbiased approach to unlocking potential opportunities in emerging market debt” to understand:
- Why many EMD managers underperform during moments of market weakness
- What that means in terms of drawdowns and volatility of returns
- How our approach seeks to deliver uncorrelated alpha, enhanced capital preservation and smoother returns